Is it right to charge this boy with child pornography?

[thir]

No, intent to possess the material in question. If Customs find a package of drugs in the post to me, for example, that isn't enough to prosecute me: they'd need to show that I was actually involved in some way, for example having paid the sender or communicated with them about it.

Ah. Thanks.

You have a point there: this isn't really what the law was intended to catch, so with luck it might be changed in future. I wouldn't hold my breath for that though.

Or they could just let them go, maybe, for that reason?