| 
 
 | 
   
    |  |  |  |   
    | An Xmas Story
    
    Author: Dragon |   
    |  | (Added on Jan 8, 2003)
            (This month 52095 readers) (Total 66939 readers) |   
    |  | Fey and Rand take a trip to the North Pole, looking for answers. |  
 
   
    | Ratings and Reviews: |   
    | Number 
      of Ratings: 2 | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |  
| 0% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |  |   
    | Weighed
      Average (?):  (5/10) |   
    | Average 
      Rating:  (4.5/10) |   
    | Highest 
      Rating:  (5/10) |   
    | Lowest 
      Rating:  (4/10) |  
 
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    boccaccio2000g
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Jan 11, 2003 |   
    |  | Talk about a Claus-trophobic story! From a technical point of view the writing was fine, but I have rarely seen a story with a less appealing premise.  "Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus.  Oops, check that -- Dragon just killed him.  Twice.  And another thing -- we'll need to change all the carols with the word 'Noel' to 'No elf'."
 There was also an unforgivable error in research -- counting Rudolph, there should be nine reindeer, not eight.  Truman Capote once wrote that the two greatest errors an author can make are getting the statistics wrong in a story about baseball and screwing up the reindeer in a Christmas story.
 OK, I made that up.  But there is an element of truth to it, don't you think?
 The story did raise an interesting question:  Does the term 'bi-polar disorder' mean that Santa has problems with his sexual identity?
 8 for sci-fi imagination and 7 for writing style -- but I regretfully have to impose a major deduction for butchering western civilization's most treasured cultural icon. (4/10)
 
 |  
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    WMassa
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Jan 10, 2003 |   
    |  | The plot is X-messy. Reporting principle seems to be confusion. But: The end of part one pretends to come along with the 'extreme'-classification, finally. (5/10) 
 |  |  |