http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...new-york-times

I wrote a while back with a comments on how the news papers and other media treated the case involving Strauss-Kahn. I hope to see some serious self-criticism among those news papers concerning objectivity and the fact that the courts decide cases, not the new papers, especially in a case with so marked political tones in it.

I further hope that some of the fundamentalistic feminists have come to their senses in this: an accusation is not automatically a proven fact.

And finallly I hope that some of us, all the rest, will maybe come to doubt the idea that the worst is not always true about other people.

The case is certainly not proven or disproven yet. But at least it has been shown that you cannot sit at home and decide what actually happened, whether you are a private person, or a journalist.

Comments would be welcome, as I was really knocked out oer the way this whole case has been treated.